Robotics flywheel
Overview of the core components required for driving the robotics flywheel and why motion logs become more and more important
Robotics has historically focused on building better hardware and tightly engineered control systems.
But the real long-term advantage is shifting toward something far less visible 'proprietary motion data' - which is generated by fleets of operating robots.
Motion logs capture joint angles, torque values, sensor inputs, and success/failure signals which are the raw data that powers learning and model refinement over time. It’s this kind of data that enables foundation models to improve and generalize over time.
In today's world, a good model on its own isn’t enough anymore. For context, even models like GR00T, Helix and other upcoming VLA models will likely become accessible or replicable overtime.
So, what sets systems apart is the feedback loop grounded in real-world experience, a loop that forms a flywheel:
→ deploy robots (even if they’re not perfect)
→ collect motion logs over millions of hours
→ train and fine-tune models on that data
→ improve performance in the field
→ drive more usage and deployments
→ repeat
The more robots you deploy, the more edge cases you encounter. And with every bit of motion history you capture, your system gets smarter. That loop compounds and the moat deepens with each cycle. In my opinion, real defensibility will now come from:
→ telemetry across diverse environments
→ hundreds of millions of task attempts: picks, failures, recoveries
→ logs labeled with failure types, outcomes, and context
→ model updates tied to measurable performance gains
→ higher success rates on edge cases: low light, occlusion, unstable terrain
Simulation tools like Isaac Sim and Mujoco are useful for early-stage learning. But they can’t necessarily replicate the messiness of the what a real physical world provides: slippery floors, unpredictable humans, crushed packaging, broken lighting and much more.
Real-world deployment creates edge-case data you can’t fake.
This is where full-stack players have a real edge. When you control the hardware, the software, and the data, you're not just learning faster, but you're also building tighter systems. And those systems evolve faster with every deployment.
Thus players like Tesla, NVIDIA, and Figure are not just building robots they are also controlling:
→ the physical systems
→ the motion logs
→ the foundation model
→ the orchestration layer that adapts on the fly
→ the deployment surface: where learning actually happens
→ the feedback loop that ties it all together
Motion logs are the new model weights.
The next wave of robotics leaders will be those who capture most diverse, high-volume, high-resolution telemetry, and build systems that continuously learn from it.